People v. Money in Fond du Lac

Lighthouse at Lakeside Park, Fond du Lac. Photo by gobucks2/flickr

It’s a tale of big money, citizen outrage, and complicit politicians, all fighting over the fate of an iconic Wisconsin park.

Often referred to as the crown jewel of Fond du Lac, Lakeside Park is so iconic that its lighthouse is in the city logo. This landmark, built in 1933, sits inside a park whose open green space and trees have provided treasured family memories for generations of Fond du Lac residents.

Now this public space is targeted by a private investors group ready to spend $5.2 million to construct a restaurant on Lighthouse Peninsula as well as a large amphitheater on Oven Island. The project would forever change the historic park that graces the shores of Lake Winnebago.

In response, Fond du Lac residents took action to oppose development of the park, through a Facebook group of 3,700 members, a petition now up to 2,676 signatures, and testimony to City Council. More than 300 have left comments about the proposal on the city’s website, the vast majority against developing the park.

When none of that worked, Friends of Lakeside Park stepped up action. The citizens group gathered thousands of signatures on a legal petition to put any development at Lakeside Park to a vote of the people, through a procedure in Wisconsin known as a 9.20 petition.

Under Wisconsin’s 9.20 statutes, citizens can enact direct city ordinances by gathering signatures from at least 15 percent of the votes cast for governor in the last election. Friends of Lakeside Park did that, gathering 3,039 signatures on a petition regarding the restaurant proposed for Lighthouse Peninsula and 2,967 signatures on a petition regarding the amphitheater proposed for Oven Island.

In both cases, the petitions would have required any developments at Fond du Lac’s crown jewel park to be voted on by the people of Fond du Lac. It wouldn’t necessarily stop such developments but would vest decision-making authority in the people rather than donors working with city officials.

Sadly, Fond du Lac city government seems determined to ram through the plan to develop Lakeside Park regardless of citizen input. On October 14, City Council rejected the petitions from Friends of Lakeside Park by a vote of 4-2, with one abstention.

City attorney Deb Hoffman advised the petitions were not proper because direct legislation cannot be used to repeal an existing ordinance — in this case Resolution 8859 to begin planning toward the Lakeside Park development plan, passed by City Council in February.

But Mary Beth Peranteau, attorney for the citizens group, disagrees. She points out the direct legislation supported by thousands of Fond du Lac citizens would not repeal Resolution 8859 but simply put it to a vote of the people.

Further, Peranteau argues, the development plan is still subject to design review and code approvals. “No plans have been submitted for approval and no funds committed to the implementation of the plan. Ultimately the effect of the direct legislation proposed by the Friends would be to add another approval requirement” – approval by the people of Fond du Lac.

So why is Fond du Lac City Council trying so hard to deny its own citizens a vote on the fate of its most iconic public park?

The answer, in short, is money. In particular, City Council members are worried that if they don’t quickly approve the proposal for private development of Lakeside Park, in the words of Council Member Ben Giles, “the money will walk.”

Indeed, the investors group is threatening to pull its $5.2 million if the controversy doesn’t reach a conclusion soon. “There have been some donors who have really expressed reluctance who keep their money allocated if there is not some certainty provided,” spokeswoman Sadie Parafiniuk said.

From where we sit, this looks an awful lot like blackmail. City Council members were elected by the people to serve the best interests of the people — and a large citizens group in Fond du Lac has clearly indicated they do not want this proposed development in Lakeside Park.

There is no reason why the restaurant could not go in a different location, either on the west side of Lakeside Park or inland along Harbor View Drive. The reason these alternate locations were not proposed is private investors want the lakeview next to the lighthouse and nearby boat slips. But such a location is not required for them to do business.

The proposed location also brings up two practical matters. First, is building a new restaurant really the right thing to do in the middle of a pandemic, when current restaurants in Fond du Lac are barely hanging on? Wouldn’t that money be better spent on helping existing businesses in Fond du Lac that are struggling?

And second, why is the city rushing to build a restaurant in the middle of a flood plain? Most of Lakeside Park is in either a 500-year or 100-year floodplain — but as we have seen, with climate change, century floods are starting to happen every few years. The floods of March 2019 are still fresh in the memories of many in Fond du Lac.

Big money shouldn’t be able to dictate all the terms of engagement with a city. City leaders should be acting on behalf of the people who elected them, and city residents should have the final word on what happens to public space their tax dollars support.

Friends of Lakeside Park has now filed legal action against the city over the rejection of their 9.20 petitions, and they need your help to pay attorney’s fees. You can support them by donating here.


How can I help?

You can start by joining and investing in our work. Follow us on Facebook and Twitter to see the latest on what we are up to. You should definitely find your local chapter and get involved with it. If there is not one in your area, you can start one. If you can’t find someone else local, or a fit for your skills, or have any questions, just contact us at


How is OWR funded? What does the money go for?

The goal is to be funded largely funded by regular contributions from our members. But we also welcome support from organizations such as grants from charitable foundations. The money we raise is used to meet basic operational costs like phones, printing, computers and Internet access, office supplies, travel and staff expenses, which are substantial even in an overwhelmingly volunteer operation. Information on the organization’s finances is reported regularly to a board of directors elected by members.


What’s your platform?

Our full platform is here for all to see. It is very detailed, but is basically organized around four big wants and needs for Wisconsin:

A Real Democracy: Democracy’s been trashed in Wisconsin, and we’ve got to get it back. That means again drawing fair election districts, making voting secure and convenient for all, getting big money out of politics, improving government transparency, restoring home rule, free association and the right to organize, standards on public performance and honesty, ending corrupt privatization, and extinguishing racism and sexism and respecting human rights.

An Economy that Works For All: This means raising income and living standards and reducing inequality. Instead of treating people like road kill and the earth like a sewer, and democratic government as something to mock and starve and corrupt, we’d like to invest in people. Our platform has lots of details on how we’d do that, but it all comes down to pursuing the goal of economic democracy—an economy that is of, by and for the people.

Quality Public Goods and Services: Wisconsin is not the richest state, but that doesn’t mean we can’t have the best quality life. We just need to work together and pool our individual resources to serve the common good, inspired by a shared commitment to great public schools, a clean environment, safe and healthy communities, and world-class health care, transportation, energy and communication systems.

Fair Taxes: We can afford these needed public investments if everybody pays their fair share in taxes. This means restoring the principle of taxation based on the ability to pay. Taxes are the price we pay for civilization. We all pay them, based on our ability, or say goodbye to civilization. It’s really as simple as that.


Where did your name come from?

Our Wisconsin Revolution is a homegrown movement started here in our state by people living here. OWR’s formation was inspired by Bernie Sanders’ run for president in 2016 and his call for a political revolution, and is part of a national movement. Our name connects us to that national movement of people all over the country supporting a new generation of progressive leaders and empowering millions to fight for progressive change and transforming our political and economic systems to once again be responsive to the needs of working families.


What’s OWR about? What’s the goal?

Our Wisconsin Revolution is about countering money power with people power. It’s about revolutionizing our politics by mobilizing the power of organized people against the reckless abuse of power by rich elites. We’re sick of what’s happening in this country and this state, where public life has been coarsened and corrupted by a swarm of greedy, rules-rigging, billionaire takers. We believe our state and nation can be set right by organized citizen action.

Our goal is to do everything we can to make Wisconsin a democracy—with a government and an economy that are of, by and for the people.